Evan Nicks begins his latest post on Substack thusly:
You definitely should read it. My first comment on the post didn’t disagree with any of it, but added my view of the situation (slightly revised here):
Yes, this is very sad. But it was quite foreseeable. Even at the time that ownership changed, it wasn't clear that any naturism at all would remain at De Anza. But we live in a society that favors the wealthiest, and if the owners aren't making as much money off their business as they want, then they will do whatever they think will work best to increase their profits.
Most of the naturist parks and resorts that still remain are in the hands of people who really believe in naturist principles. But they're always getting older, as are the majority of their customers. Neither they nor their customers can reverse that, of course. The sad fact is that there aren't enough customers. The law of supply and demand is a basic fact of economics. As demand declines, so also will supply. But increase the demand, and the supply will soon follow.
So exactly who should work harder to promote demand for naturist venues? Is that not the main responsibility of naturist organizations - at all levels? It's also a prime responsibility of owners/managers of naturist properties. But as De Anza shows, some think that abandoning naturism will increase profits much faster.
Individual naturists themselves need to play a significant role by promoting naturism within their own social networks. That's a very important type of "organization". Yet little seems to be happening there either. Yes, a few people, like Evan, are doing their part. But clearly there aren't nearly enough promoters of naturism at any level.
Naturists should get a clue from writers and actors in the movie industry. They're on strike now against the studios due to a reasonable fear of being given short shrift by the studio owners. That tactic may well work for them. Naturists will have to use very different tactics from those of the writers and actors if naturism is to survive and grow. But one factor remains the same: everyone who has a stake in the success of naturism must come together to organize and work for that objective.
But then by chance I just opened the latest edition (42.4) of TNSF’s magazine N. There I found a long article by Mark Storey on Southern California naturism. He mentioned De Anza Springs only briefly at the end. So I commented again on Evan’s article:
Mark writes about the trip he and his wife made to the area last December. Although they spent 3 weeks in the area, there was enough to do that they didn't quite make it as far south as De Anza. But Mark concludes, hopefully, that "we heard good things about what the new owners are doing there, and hope to visit the site in 2023." So much for that idea, I guess.
Mark also writes in that article about Joshua Tree National Park, saying "It's delightfully easy to hike miles free of clothes" there. And, guess what, right now there's a 94,009-acre wildfire in the general area, and it's only 34% contained. Although Mark may not have hiked naked in that exact area, there are now more than 90,000 acres perfect for nude hiking that won't be the same for hundreds of years. Joshua Trees don't grow outside that part of the country, and those in the affected location may never return. It's unclear at this point whether the cause was climate change or human carelessness (or both). However, such fires affect wide-open spaces that are among the last places naturists can enjoy nudity outdoors without hassles. Canadian naturists have probably lost much more from this year’s recent fires (in a climate that affords much less time for going naked in nature).
Bottom line: naturists seem to be steadily losing opportunities for nudity in the great outdoors as well as in private clubs.
It seems to me that these two circumstances, although quite different, point very much in the same unfortunate direction. Naturism in the U.S. is gradually shrinking in popularity - for various reasons noted above, though they are hardly the only ones. If naturism is to have much of a future in this country, it’s urgent for currently active naturist to step up their activity to a significant degree.
There’s nothing naturists can really do about wildfires in forests and other sparsely populated areas where outdoor naturist recreation is still possible. But there is actually quite a lot naturists could do - if they were willing - to reverse the loss of naturist beaches, clubs, parks, and resorts. I wrote about one quite viable possibility in the previous edition of my own newsletter (here). The short answer is: Recruit more people into active naturism. In future newsletter articles I’ll discuss various additional ideas for doing that.
The Canadian wildfires didn't really impact naturists, many of the places that were impacted aren't habitable. :)
I think naturists need to realize that they aren't the only group who enjoys nudity nor do they own the narrative on body acceptance. I'm not talking about swingers or sex clubs in regard to groups. I mean queen communities, feminist communities, multicultural communities, Wiccan communities, green communities, etc.
The values of naturists are incredibly important. Not every nudist subscribes to these values. Yet there's acknowledgement of a mutual interest. This intersection is available in many other places.
While the PR side of naturists proclaim being open, there are a lot of silent scripts that chafe against that. I bristle when I hear ignorant and hateful comments towards others in clubs, not just because they don't sit well with my values, but because they lead to stagnation and attrition.
To grow, you can't attract more of the same. You need different people and to let them have a role in defining what is what. This is true for any brand, service, etc.
Joshua Tree National Park is over 1200 square mile in area and hundreds of miles of trails. Hike where there hasn't been a recent fire and there's still plenty of opportunity. I go out there every year just to do that. CA has vast areas of BLM land and National Forest land available for hiking. There are National Parks and Preserves . Most trails never see a hiker for days on end.
https://aunatural.org/2022/09/07/naked-in-joshua-tree-national-park/
It isn't that the opportunity has disappeared. Almost nobody ever takes advantage of it. There are no California nude hiking groups other than the San Diego Camping Bears. They are pretty small. There just aren't enough nudies interested. That's the problem. And there aren't enough nudies because we're comfortable enough with an occasional visit to a beach or a club and not at all comfortable with leaving the closet to let textiles know about what we love.
I'm not arguing for Jehovah's Witnesses style of proselyting or evangelical behavior. There are communities where a public nudist would get excoriated and ostracized.
OTOH, nudists feel subconscious shame, too much fear, and too little value is placed on being authentic to be open about it. Just letting their close friends, significant other, or even a spouse know they're a nudist without any particular advocacy is more than many are capable of. I don't see a fix for this.
The place for nudist blogs is in the main stream blogging community, Blogging to the nudist community is just preaching to the choir.